Let and
Enjoy!
Happy New Year
December 31, 2009 by bartogianWhy Asians learn quicker II
December 29, 2009 by bartogianI have managed to obtain the hardcopy of the SMH article referred to in my previous post and have scanned it. I now make the (main) missing part that didn’t appear online available for readers to view and discuss. (click to enlarge)

Why Asians learn quicker
August 24, 2009 by bartogianIt has come to my attention that Sampson Wong has recently appeared in a newspaper article.
The HTML title “Why Asians learn quicker” appears to bear little resemblance to the article. Discuss.
Live Footy Streaming on ESPN
August 7, 2009 by bartogianIt may only be showing three of the eight AFL matches each week live, but it is now available for free at ESPN.
arXiv:0907.2675
August 4, 2009 by bartogianIt appears to be a tradition in the mathblogosphere to announce when a new preprint appears on the arXiv. Now I’m not really part of the mathblogosphere, but still, I present to you Metaplectic Whittaker Functions and Crystal Bases.
This is wrong
August 2, 2009 by bartogian72.2
Hauritz to Flintoff, SIX, oooh, Flintoff uses the feet here and lofts Hauritz clean over long-on, lovely shot, after some third-umpire assistance that is ruled a six having hit the boundary on the full
Not that it is the wrong interpretation of the rules, but in that the boundary should be given to the fielding team, like in the good old days when this would’ve been only four runs.
Attention readers of Terry Tao’s blog
May 17, 2009 by bartogianThis should be relevant to everyone.

What's New in Google Reader
Dear Google Reader,
I am not subscribed to this blog because I can’t read all of its entries in google reader. I’m not sure whose fault this is, but until this is sorted, I’m just going to have to continue visiting What’s new directly.
[note this picture is a few days old, and if anyone could offer technical support to make it more viewable, that would be appreciated.]
Keyboard Remapping for Latex
May 9, 2009 by bartogianIt is patently obvious that the keyboard was designed for English typing, as opposed to typing or anything else that heavily relies on non-alphanumeric characters (like coding). Frustrated by the ergonomics and speed of this, I have finally decided to take matters into my own hands, I have used the Microsoft Keyboard Layout Creator (I use the XP virus) to obtain a partial solution (not original) to the problem.
Essentially, I looked at the keyboard and asked myself which keys are pressed more commonly in the shifted position than the unshifted position. My answer (not backed up by any actual data) is the seven keys.
$ ^ ( ) _ { }
So I remapped those to swap their shifted and unshifted modes.
For good measure I swapped the popular \ with the unpopular and far away ;.
This I believe is still only a partial solution, for example the characters 0 – + should probably replace ` 7 8 as being unshifted, though this has not been carried through as yet for some bizarre desire to not have my keyboard behaving too differently from how it looks.
There are unfortunately some drawbacks, I’ve noticed that typing \p is awkward, and that it makes me noticeably slower now when typing on other machines, but I try to do all my texing on my laptop. This remapping also solves the asthetic problem I always had with a keyboard which was that the minus sign was considered more important than the plus sign (who cares about hyphens anyway?) and now I have them on an even footing, although as noted above, they really should both become unshifted.
The difference betweeen zed and zee
March 24, 2009 by bartogianBack in the day when I was a student at mathscamp, one thing that I was taught and have taken on board since is the advice to always cross one’s zeds when handwriting mathematics, to ensure that they are distinguishable from the numeral 2. I continue to favour this practice and try to promote it myself to any students that I teach, for I find it really makes a difference (and this is probably also the reason why I started to get into the habit of crossing one’s 7s).
Being in the USA, I get a lot of mispronounciation of zed as zee, and I would like to argue that it is an inferior pronunciation for a similar reason. If one enunciates zee, then (this varies with the person, their accent and the context) it can require some thought and/or guesswork to eludicate the difference between (or
or
and
(or
or
). And it is for this reason why I believe that zed is the superior pronounciation of the twenty-sixth letter of the alphabet, and will advocate for its adoption across the english speaking world.
MADip discussion forum
March 20, 2009 by bartogianThis post exists to allow people to comment on this post at MADip.